 |
25.1.11.4
(01-09-2008) Developing Potential Fraud Cases
-
Generally, the Service must illustrate that there is (1) tax due, and (2) underpayment of tax due, to demonstrate intent to
evade tax or willful and material submission of false statements or false documents in connection with an application and/or
return. Review the criminal criteria set forth in LEM Law Enforcement Manual (LEM) 5.4 for additional guidance.
-
Avoidance of tax is not a criminal offense. Taxpayers have the right to reduce or avoid their taxes by legitimate methods.
Tax evasion and tax avoidance are different. Tax evasion is the illegal act of not reporting income, underreporting income,
or providing false information to the IRS. Tax avoidance is a legal means used to lower tax liability by arranging financial
affairs to the best advantage and by claiming rightful deductions, credits, and adjustments. Avoidance does not involve concealment
or misrepresentation, but works within the legal parameters to shape events to reduce tax. Fraud may exist when a taxpayer
willfully
attempts to illegally underreport taxes, not pay taxes, or both.
-
Common indicators of fraud within Campus Collection involve the following issues:
-
Refer to IRM 25.1.2.2 , Indicators of Fraud, for additional information on fraud indicators.
-
When a potential fraud indicator is found, fraud development must be considered, even though further consideration may find
that a referral or transfer of the case is not warranted. The CFFC should assist with assessing the fraud development potential
and determine an appropriate plan of action.
-
Further development of the fraud indicators is necessary to document firm indications (affirmative acts) for successful fraud cases.
|
|
 |