 |
25.1.5.4
(01-01-2003) Civil Settlement
-
Upon completion of the grand jury investigation,
cases originating in an examination function will be released from Grand Jury
Suspense and returned for civil settlement. Examiners who had access to grand
jury information are
"tainted"
for civil settlement and
cannot be assigned to the case. Rule 6(e) precludes the use of
"
matters occurring before the grand jury"
in any subsequent civil action.
Per Rule 6(e)(3)(B), Any person to whom matters are disclosed under subparagraph
(A)(ii) of this paragraph shall not utilize that grand jury material for any
purpose other than assisting the attorney for the government in the performance
of such attorney's duty to enforce federal criminal law.
-
The examiner may use information in public record,
including the search warrant affidavit, indictment, plea agreement and other
information in the court file. As discussed above, the grand jury revenue
agent will gather this information during the grand jury investigation and
at the conclusion of the grand jury investigation, forward the information
to the territory manager designee.
-
Since the taxpayer may not be convicted for all
years in the indictment, information available may not be complete. A Rule
6(e) order may be obtained through the U.S. Attorney’s Office to disclose
grand jury information when the information is needed
"preliminarily
to or in connection with a judicial proceeding."
There must be a
"particularized need"
in that the information cannot be obtained
from some other source. An IRS civil examination does not meet this requirement.
There must be specific litigation, such as a Tax Court or District Court proceeding.
-
The touchstone of Rule 6(e)’s applicability
is whether the disclosed material would
"elucidate the inner
workings of the grand jury."
The
"inner workings"
test
would preclude disclosure of evidence which tended to reveal the identity
and/or testimony of witnesses, the direction of the investigation and the
deliberation of the grand jurors.
-
The examiner should ask Cl if they have possession
of specific documents known to be non-grand jury evidence. A memorandum from
the field territory manager to the SAC should be prepared providing a brief
explanation of the situation and the specific documents requested.
-
Grand jury evidence cannot be released even when
the taxpayer volunteers to execute a waiver authorizing disclosure. The taxpayer
could furnish records in their possession even though the grand jury subpoenaed
those very records.
-
If a court determines the IRS has improperly used
grand jury material, the court may refuse to admit the evidence, reverse the
burden of proof and/or require the IRS to proceed with evidence not derived
from the grand jury. Further, the court may decide to dismiss the case, without
prejudice, due to government misconduct. If the court determined the IRS intentionally
used grand jury material, attorney and legal fees could be awarded to the
taxpayer.
|
|
 |