IRS Definition of Fraud

25.1.1.2  (07-18-2008)
Definition of Fraud

  1. Fraud is deception by misrepresentation of material facts, or silence when good faith requires expression, resulting in material damage to one who relies on it and has the right to rely on it. Simply stated, it is obtaining something of value from someone else through deceit.

  2. Tax fraud is often defined as an intentional wrongdoing on the part of a taxpayer, with the specific purpose of evading a tax known or believed to be owing. Tax fraud requires both:

    • a tax due and owing; and

    • fraudulent intent.

25.1.1.2.1  (07-18-2008)
Definitions—General

  1. The compliance employee must be familiar with the following legal terms in order to understand the requirements of proof:

    1. Burden of Proof - the obligation to offer evidence that a court (judge or jury) could reasonably believe in support of a contention. In tax fraud cases, the burden of proof is on the Government.

    2. Evidence - data presented to a judge or jury in proof of the facts in issue and which may include the testimony of witnesses, records, documents, or objects. Evidence is distinguished from proof in that the latter are the result or effect of evidence.

    3. Direct Evidence - evidence in the form of testimony from a witness who actually saw, heard, or touched the subject of questioning. Direct evidence, which is believed, proves existence of fact in issue without inference or presumption.

    4. Circumstantial Evidence - evidence based on inference and not personal observation.

    5. Presumption (of law) - a rule of law that a judge or jury will draw a particular inference from a particular fact, or from particular evidence, unless and until the truth of such inference is disproved.

    6. Inference - a logical conclusion from given facts.

    7. Preponderance of evidence - evidence that will incline an impartial mind to one side rather than the other so as to remove the cause from the realm of speculation. It does not relate merely to the quantity of evidence. Simply stated, evidence which is more convincing than the evidence offered in opposition.

    8. Reasonable doubt - a doubt that would cause a prudent person to hesitate before acting in matters of importance to themselves. Such a doubt will leave a juror's mind uncertain after examination of the evidence.

    9. Willful Intent to Defraud - an intentional wrongdoing with the specific purpose of evading a tax believed by the taxpayer to be owing.

    10. Clear and Convincing Evidence - evidence showing that the thing to be proved is highly probable or reasonably certain. This is a greater burden of proof than preponderance of the evidence but less than beyond a reasonable doubt.

25.1.1.2.2  (05-19-1999)
Requirements of Proof

  1. Understanding the requirements of proof is essential in establishing fraud. In all criminal and civil tax fraud cases, the burden of proof is on the Government.

  2. The major difference between civil and criminal fraud is the degree of proof required.

    1. In criminal cases, the Government must present sufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

    2. In civil fraud cases, the Government must prove fraud by clear and convincing evidence.

25.1.1.2.3  (05-19-1999)
Civil vs. Criminal

  1. Civil fraud results in a remedial action taken by the government such as assessing the correct tax and imposing civil penalties as an addition to tax, as well as retrieving transferred assets. Civil penalties are assessed and collected administratively as a part of the tax.

  2. Criminal fraud results in a punitive action with penalties consisting of fines and/or imprisonment. Criminal penalties:

    • Are enforced only by prosecution;

    • Are provided to punish the taxpayer for wrongdoings; and

    • Serve as a deterrent to other taxpayers.

  3. A tax fraud offense may result in both civil and criminal penalties.

25.1.1.2.4  (07-18-2008)
Avoidance vs. Evasion

  1. Avoidance of tax is not a criminal offense. Taxpayers have the right to reduce, avoid, or minimize their taxes by legitimate means. One who avoids tax does not conceal or misrepresent, but shapes and preplans events to reduce or eliminate tax liability within the perimeters of the law.

  2. Evasion involves some affirmative act to evade or defeat a tax, or payment of tax. Examples of affirmative acts are deceit, subterfuge, camouflage, concealment, attempts to color or obscure events, or make things seem other than they are.

  3. Common evasion schemes include:

    • Intentional understatement or omission of income,

    • Claiming fictitious or improper deductions,

    • False allocation of income, and/or

    • Improper claims, credits, or exemptions.


Fouts Law Office · 572 Maddox Drive, Suite 213 · Ellijay, GA 30540 · Tel: (800) 509-2770 · Fax: (706) 636-5293
From the Tax Blog
One Stop Shop for IRS Tax Resources

Note: The links are here for informational purposes only. They are ...

What’s The Difference Between Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion?

There are two constants in life – death and taxes. Since neither ...

IRS Information
Avoid jail time for failing to pay taxes
Our Respect For Clients
IRS Tax Collection Enforcement
DOJ Tax Division
Explanation of IRS Tax Codes
Videos about IRS policy
Tax Judgment Collection Manual
Tax Articles
International Tax Collection by the IRS
Your Righs During an IRS Tax Audit
What It Takes To Get An IRS Employee Fired
Declare Yourself Tax-Exempt?
12 Common Tax Scams
IRS Employee Misconduct
Avoid Tax Audits
IRS Collection
IRS Tax Videos
Get Your Tax Refund
Why Use a Tax Attorney
State Income Taxes
Tax Scams
Income Tax History