Posts Tagged ‘economy’

Adam Smith was right: We need “certain” tax

Thursday, July 15th, 2010

Adam Smith wrote the book “The Wealth of Nations”, a massive work that set the tone for employment, economics, and industrialization in the US. Published in 1776, much of Smith’s work is as relevant today as it was back then.

Among his many insightful economic positions, he believed that taxes were a good thing but they should be “certain, and not arbitrary”.

No one here disputes that we shouldn’t have taxes. Taxes are necessary to pay for roads and police and the many other services that come with living in the US. But what we do have a problem with is that the tax code has become a tool to redistribute wealth, taking it from some and giving it to others, ultimately redefining the American Dream into something that looks more like a socialist economy.

Adam Smith believed that taxes should be “certain, not arbitrary” but our taxes right now are anything but certain! Filling out tax forms – accomplished by wading through an overwhelming number of forms and documents – is akin to pulling the lever on a slot machine… but a slot machine that punishes you instead of rewards you!

Smith proposed a flat tax. While I realize that there are many challenges to implementing a flat tax, and there are reasons why a flat tax might not work, it is the most equitable form of taxation because it is certain and knowable. In fact, a flat tax might actually decrease the amount of bureaucracy and expense incurred by the IRS every single year in trying to understand their own tax code and then trying to enforce it.

The Washington Times has a fascinating article that starts by talking about the IRS and how IRS employees are receiving a growing number of threats for trying to enforce Congress’ tax laws but then, on page 2 of the article, it launches into a scathing examination of IRS employee culpability and ultimately concludes with other great thoughts by Adam Smith. Read the full article here.

“Hello, I’m with the Government and I’m Here to Help You.”

Friday, January 16th, 2009

Last year, most Americans watched as their investment portfolios and 401K’s vanished before their very eyes, as if they were conjured away by some twisted magician. After watching our home values erode and the date of our retirement stretch further and further into the future, we thought we’d been beat up enough.

Then, in December, this “turmoil” became something worse – a recession. And on its heels, there is some talk of a depression.

It certainly wasn’t easy for many Americans to celebrate during Christmas: Money is tight, unemployment is rising, homes are devalued, and the short-term outlook is not exactly positive. We all hoped that Santa was going to bring some good news. But it didn’t happen.

We all know what the economic turmoil means for us as consumers and employees. But what does it mean for us as tax payers? How does this recession impact our taxes? There are a few interesting things at work here.

There are stories like this grim report of California’s economy and this grimmer report of Illinois’ economy. Similar stories echo in one state after another. What is implied is that the provision of services at the local, state, and federal level is funded by your tax dollars. And I don’t know about your perspective, but in my experience, governments rarely seek out alternative funding methods and instead raise taxes, create new taxes, and/or increase pressure on their tax collectors to track down those who aren’t paying. So, on the one hand, governments are struggling and need to increase revenues to pay the bills.

At the federal level, something very different is beginning to take shape. Obama is moving into office in just a couple of weeks and he is putting together a stunningly large “stimulus” package intending to improve the economy. That’s good — if you believe in that sort of fiscal irresponsibility. Of course no one wants the economy to continue as it is, and whether we agree or not on whether such stimulus packages actually work or not, we’re about to be saddled with the mother of all stimulus packages – almost a trillion dollars.

We can be sure that our taxes will be impacted, and I don’t mean they’ll be going down. (Read more about the stimulus package and other economic plans from Obama here).

A careful reading of the true economic history of the FDR era (as opposed to liberal statist propaganda which seeks to justify ever-enlarging government control and spending to create a nanny state) it is plain to see that the depression-era economy actually got worse the more government intervened with its many fixes. There were “unintended consequences”. If the stimulus package doesn’t work, we can expect a similar federal story to the state stories I mentioned earlier. But if the stimulus package does work, we will have more people back at work. That’s a very good thing. Because we’ll need them to pay off that trillion dollars of government debt.

With the government owing a trillion dollars, Congress will likely do one of two things. They will either:

1) Attempt to make the people who still pay taxes pay even more taxes, or

2) They will attempt to make the non-taxpayers who don’t pay taxes start paying them.

Don’t hold your breath waiting on that second option to be enacted since that would take guts — something most politicians are in short supply of.

Maybe I’m just cynical, but those are the scenarios we may expect to see playing out in 2009.

Fouts Law Office · 772 Maddox Drive, Suite 114 · East Ellijay, GA 30540 · Tel: (800) 509-2770 · Fax: (706) 636-5293
Home | Sitemap | *Disclaimer* | Affiliate Program | Income Tax Videos | State Taxes | Tax Attorney | Tax News