Archive for the ‘Tax Audits’ Category

The Difference Between an Audit Reconsideration and an Audit Appeal

Thursday, January 26th, 2012

There is an important distinction between an audit reconsideration and an audit appeal, and these options are part of our arsenal of tactics to fight the IRS.

How Does an Audit Reconsideration Differ from an Audit Appeal?

You might have found yourself in a situation where you don’t quite agree with the IRS’s decision to audit your taxes. While your first reaction might be terror, there’s likely nothing to be afraid of.
(more…)

Business IRS Tax Audit Techniques Guides (ATGs)

Tuesday, November 15th, 2011

IRS Tax Audit Guides
Would you like to be prepared for your IRS audit by knowing the kinds of questions the IRS will ask you even before they arrive? Perhaps you’d like to know what areas the IRS studies for your specific business type?

(more…)

Tax Audits – 10 Must Read Articles from Attorney Jeff Fouts

Thursday, June 9th, 2011

IRS-audit-info-from-jeff-fouts-tax-attorney This article offers some hard won information on IRS audits from 18 years of representing clients before the IRS. Audits are triggered for all sorts of reasons. Some that you wouldn’t even expect:

“In 2008 alone, the IRS received 476 tips identifying 1,246 questionable taxpayers, according to the article. “Many claims are for substantially more than the $2 million threshold and involve business or wealthy individuals,” IRS Whistleblower Office director Stephen Whitlock is quoted as saying.” – How to Avoid a Tax Audit by Bilal Kaiser – April 2010 LegalZoom.com”

Whistle Blowers are one of the lesser known ways that the IRS is triggered to perform an audit. Frankly, it’s not common and I hear from clients all the time that they’ve blown the whistle on a ‘cheating’ ex-spouse for years and waited while nothing was done.

So how does the IRS choose whom to audit? Read our post The Tax Audit Process and IRS Audit Selection Method for the answer.

Wondering about ways you can gain the upper hand in an IRS audit? Read this article 6 Critical Audit Rules To Help You Turn The Tables On The IRS.

Is there an appeals process for audits? Yes, see Audit Reconsideration & Appeals: Even The IRS Gives You A Second Chance.

There are the top tax problems that lead to hiring a tax attorney. Learn the role that tax return software and inexperienced tax prepares play in earning you an audit:

  1. Top Sources of Tax Problems That Lead to Hiring a Tax Attorney
  2. Top Sources of Tax Problems That Lead to Hiring a Tax Attorney – Part 2

You’ll want to Know your rights in Tax Audits and hear a A Word To The Wise on Avoiding IRS Audits.

ABC News interviewed me for their story about the IRS targeting the self-employed for audits. With more and more people leaving big companies due to layoffs the self employed remain a big revenue earner for the IRS.
Read my interview about IRS targeting self employed people ABC News.

If nothing else, a little tax humor might help ease you into getting your audit over with… 8 Reasons IRS Tax Audits are like the Salem Witchcraft Trials (a little Tax Humor)

Until next time,

Jeffrey I. Fouts, Tax Attorney
You can put off your tax problem, or put us to work.

Here’s a bio of sorts. I’m happily married with two kids. I’m a real small town tax lawyer (Ellijay, pop. 1,584) not some fictional marketing character. I represent tax payers before the IRS in all 50 states. I have 18 years experience, thousands of satisfied clients, about 8 critics at last count, and an A+ BBB Rating.

I’m a member in good standing of the bar and have active memberships in courts from Georgia to Washington D.C. My competitors covet my Google ranking but my clients covet my sound counsel. I deal directly with my clients and have a small, tireless staff. You can put off your tax problem, or put us to work.

Top Sources of Tax Problems That Lead to Hiring a Tax Attorney – Part 2

Thursday, March 31st, 2011

Tax Attorney Jeff Fouts discusses the biggest sources of tax problems his clients experinece

Low cost tax preparation services might be more trouble than their worth

Yesterday, I talked about one of the biggest sources of tax problems that lead individuals and businesses to hire me to represent them as their tax attorney before the IRS. If you are coming here new, please read my previous post about the ‘gotchas’ that can occur with tax software.

Today, I want to talk about the next biggest source of tax problems that my clients experience and then give you 5 ways to avoid tax problems when working with a tax preparer.

Low Price Tax Preparation Services

You know the old saying “If I had a nickel for every time a _________ I’d be rich!”?

Well, I’m not rich but I have built a successful tax law practice over 19 years because of the number of people who have been burned by low cost tax services. With apologies for my dry humor, in my practice these firms rank almost neck and neck with tax preparation software as my highest performing sales channel!

So why do so many tax problems stem from low cost tax services? (more…)

Top Sources of Tax Problems That Lead to Hiring a Tax Attorney

Wednesday, March 30th, 2011

tax-software-problems-webWhen people hire me as their tax attorney to fix their IRS tax problem one of my first steps is to research what caused the problem in the first place. You may be surprised to hear that it’s not the tax payer’s ignorance, negligence or fraud that are the top sources of my client’s tax problem.

Let me put it this way, if it wasn’t for popular tax return software, and other problem areas I’ll discuss later this week, I might not be able to make a living as a tax attorney.

Tax Return software

Most of the tax return preparation programs today use an interview format to make it easier on you to complete your taxes. Sounds great, but in practice this leads to one of my client’s biggest problem areas.

The interview based approach favored by tax software can lead to double counting in areas like your expenses. In other words, it looks like you owe less tax than you really do. The minute you submit this inaccurate return you’ve potentially triggered an IRS audit flag. Ultimately, you’ll also owe back taxes and interest on the tax amount you should have paid.

You’d think by the tone of my comments that I was selling tax return preparation but I’m not. I just fix the problems once they’ve already happened.

What’s the solution to avoiding tax problems with Tax Return Preparation software?

(more…)

The Tax Audit Process and IRS Audit Selection Method

Wednesday, February 2nd, 2011

jeff-fouts-explains-irs-tax-audits-400px

Why do we dread the prospect of having our tax returns audited? We have this fear of something we probably don’t understand very well – the unknown. The perception is that it will be stressful, will take a lot of time, and burden us with demands that may seem unreasonable. And no matter what, the result will be to owe more money to the government.

Statistically the chances of being audited are low. In fiscal year 2008, the IRS audited 1% of the more than 137 million returns filed the year before. That being said, nearly 1.4 million tax audits were undertaken.

Let’s take a look at the examination process, and what an audit entails. The IRS audits (examines) tax returns to verify that the tax reported is correct. And contrary to popular belief, a selected return for examination does not always suggest that the taxpayer has made an error or been dishonest. In fact, some examinations result in a refund to the taxpayer or acceptance of the return without change. The overwhelming majority of taxpayers file accurate returns and make payments on time. But, obviously, the vast majority of the tax audits undertaken by the IRS are conducted because they have detected invalid deductions or other expenses and it is confident that the audit will result in a tax bill.

The IRS selects returns for audits using a variety of methods. Some returns are selected for examination on the basis of computer scoring. Computer programs give each tax return a numeric “score”. The Discriminant Function System (DIF) score rates the potential for change, based on past IRS experience with similar returns. The score is based on the IRS’s study of a sample set of thousands of returns. The Unreported Income DIF (UIDIF) score rates the return for the potential of unreported income. IRS personnel screen the highest-scoring returns, selecting some for audit and identifying the items on these returns that are most likely to need review.

Some returns are examined using Information Matching, which identifies payer reports (such as Forms W-2 from employers or Form 1099 interest statements from banks) that do not match the income reported on the tax return. The IRS examines many large corporate returns annually. Returns may also be selected for audit when they involve issues or transactions with other taxpayers, such as business partners or investors, whose returns were selected for examination.

Still other returns are selected based on information obtained by the IRS through efforts to identify promoters and participants of abusive tax avoidance transactions. Examples include information received from “John Doe” summonses issued to credit card companies and businesses and participant lists from promoters ordered by the courts to be turned over to the IRS.

The first step in an audit will be a computer-generated letter from the IRS, and most of these letters involve minor issues. According to the General Accounting Office, about half of the 10 million notices the IRS issues each year are because the information is “incorrect, unresponsive or incomplete.” The biggest reason people receive letters from the IRS is human error.

Each year, more than 1 million letters are sent to people because they failed to sign their returns. These types of errors rarely lead to a full audit. If the error is not easily identified, the tax audit begins. An audit is actually the process where the IRS asks you to substantiate the numbers on your tax return.

Many audits are “correspondence” audits. Nobody likes to get a letter from the IRS, but it’s probably not as bad as a visit from an IRS agent. More than 1 million of the almost 1.4 million audits last year were correspondence audits, while about 310,000 were field audits.

The audit notification letter tells which records will be needed. Taxpayers may act on their own behalf or have someone represent or accompany them. The auditor will explain the reason for any proposed changes.

An examination may be conducted by mail or through an in-person interview and review of the taxpayer’s records. The interview may be at an IRS office (office audit) or at the taxpayer’s home, place of business, or accountant’s office (field audit).

The IRS trains its employees to explain and protect taxpayers’ rights throughout their contacts with taxpayers.

These taxpayer rights include

  • A right to professional and courteous treatment by IRS employees.
  • A right to privacy and confidentiality about tax matters.
  • A right to know why the IRS is asking for information, how the IRS will use it and what will happen if the requested information is not provided.
  • A right to representation, by oneself or an authorized representative.
  • A right to appeal disagreements, both within the IRS and before the courts.

Appeal Rights are explained by the examiner at the beginning of each audit. Taxpayers who do not agree with the proposed changes may appeal by having a supervisory conference with the examiner’s manager or appeal their case administratively within the IRS, to the U.S. Tax Court, U.S. Claims Court or the local U.S. District Court. If there is no agreement at the closing conference with the examiner or the examiner’s manager, the taxpayer has 30 days to consider the proposed adjustments and their next course of action.

If the taxpayer does not respond within 30 days, the IRS issues a statutory notice of deficiency, which gives the taxpayer 90 days to file a petition to the Tax Court. The Claims Court and District Court generally do not hear tax cases until after the tax is paid and administrative refund claims have been denied by the IRS. The tax does not have to be paid to appeal within the IRS or to the Tax Court. A case may be further appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals or to the Supreme Court, if those courts accept the case.

The “Art” of Collecting Taxes

Saturday, October 2nd, 2010

Who knew the Federal Government has a division for appraising and valuing fine art. This division is called the Art Advisory Panel, and they meet twice a year to determine the value of art in tax audits.

The government hates to miss out on collecting revenue, so they have hired their own panel of art experts to ensure all taxpayers pay taxes on the fair market value of their art.

Beauty may be priceless, but the IRS won’t hesitate to put a price tag on it and send you a bill.

Read more about the Art Advisory Panel from their official site.

8 Reasons IRS Tax Audits are like the Salem Witchcraft Trials

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

salem Witchcraft Trial
1. It’s scary. They come to you: One night, there’s a knock on your door. It’s not the neighbors bringing over some freshly baked cookies. If the year was 1692, it was a mob with torches. If the year is 2010, it’s someone in a suit. Either way, it’s not a joyful occasion.

2. Claim a higher authority: The Salem Witch Trials over-extended the moral authority of respected public and religious offices. Today’s tax audits extend (and I would say they over-extend) the authority of the government.

3. Their purpose is discovery: Unlike criminal trials where all sides are considered and a judgment reached, these trials are related to discovery. Their purpose is to examine the “evidence” and draw a conclusion.

4. Guilty until proven innocent: In both cases, they didn’t come to you because you were average. The IRS came to you assuming that you’ve done something wrong and you have to prove that you didn’t do anything wrong.

5. Nothing you can do about it: Neither situation is one where you can take your time and appeal to rational thinkers during the audit. Auditors are out for blood and will leave no stone left unturned to find it.

6. Not a clear understanding of the rules being broken: In the Salem Witch Trials, those putting witches on trial weren’t exactly clear about how they defined and measured witchcraft, and what to do about it. Similarly, during an IRS audit, no auditor can be fully aware of the thousands of pages of tax code that could work for you or against you. The auditor is simply working on “best guess” and what he or she can recall or easily research.

7. (If you’ll excuse the language) “Damned if you do and damned if you don’t”: In Salem in 1692, an accusation was just the first step but it was very likely that you’d end up with a guilty verdict. Even those who were innocent of these crimes endured a lot. During a tax audit, your life is turned inside out and upside down and even if (by some stroke of luck) you have never missed a receipt or overlooked an expense, you’ll still endure the pain and frustration of an audit.

8. Scarlet letter: Audits don’t go away easily. You can be sure that the information gleaned during an audit will be used to verify information later. And if the audit reveals that you do owe taxes, the odds are high they’ll watch you closely afterward to make sure you continue to obey the tax law.

Is Your Business A Target for A Worker Classification Audit?

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

open for business In today’s evolving business world, one of the ways that some small business owners are saving money and improving the competitiveness of their business is by hiring contractors instead of employees. Contractors take care of their own taxes and insurance, they (presumably) are good at their work, and business owners don’t have to keep them on if there isn’t work for them to do. All in all, contractors can make good business sense.

The IRS agrees… to a point. They believe that some business owners are circumventing their responsibilities by filling roles with contractors when they should be filled with employees. The result? A worker classification audit by the IRS to ensure that each business owner is correctly playing the taxes they should be paying (on employees) and not avoiding those taxes (by calling them “contractors” instead).

Moreover, the IRS may run this audit at the same time as a tax audit or it may choose to perform a tax audit afterward, if it feels that there are unpaid taxes to be found.

What is frustrating is the lack of clear rules around what the IRS considers a “legitimate” reason to have a contractor instead of an employee. The rules aren’t always clear. In fact, this Inc. Magazine article by Matt Quinn tries to outline the guidelines the IRS has in deciding whether or not the roles they are investigating should be filled by employees or contractors and it’s clear from the article that it’s not clear to the IRS! (Read the article here).

Check out Quinn’s step-by-step suggestions and make sure you’re ready because the IRS is coming. They’re randomly selecting 6,000 businesses to audit. I believe that if they find enough businesses that are breaking their poorly defined rules, we’ll see even more of these audits in the future.

This is just another way that current tax laws make life uncertain for business owners.

[Image source: Velkr0]

IRS Agent Accepts Bribes for Favorable Audits

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

100 dollar bills Hearing you have been selected for audit will concern anyone. When two Minnesota businesspeople received their audit letter, they were likely dismayed. However, like good law-abiding citizens, they met with their accountant and the IRS auditor, Roger Anthony Coombs, at their attorney’s office. You can imagine their surprise when the auditor offered to minimize their taxes owing with a $9,000 payment to himself!

That’s right! He requested a bribe in exchange for a favorable audit result. Fortunately, the quick-thinking businesspeople met again, recorded the conversation, and brought it to the attention of the authorities.

Coombs was arrested early in June and, if found guilty, could serve up to 15 years in prison. (Read the full story about the us IRS officer being bribed here).

This is a shocking news story but it prompts me to think further. Coombs only started working for the IRS in June 2009. If this was his very first foray into bribery, it took him a total of 11 months. Eleven months! Was this guy not vetted before his job? Did he have a squeaky-clean record and only turned bad in less than a year? Is this, in fact, his first attempt at stealing from taxpayers?

Another thing I’m prompted to think about is this: There are about 120,000 people working for the IRS. This is one story of one tax agent who was caught. How many more are there are operating a successful bribery scam? I’m sure it is incredibly tempting for anyone facing an income tax audit and a lot of money owing to the IRS to instead give a small amount to an agent to make the situation go away.

The last thing I’m prompted to think about: If the businesspeople in the story really do owe $60,000 in back taxes, is the IRS still going to send in an auditor to finish the job? These people did the right thing in the face of a very tempting crime. Their possible reward might be an actual audit!

[Image source: AMagill]

Fouts Law Office · 772 Maddox Drive, Suite 114 · East Ellijay, GA 30540 · Tel: (800) 509-2770 · Fax: (706) 636-5293
Home | Sitemap | *Disclaimer* | Affiliate Program | Income Tax Videos | State Taxes | Tax Attorney | Tax News